Communities caring for catchments
Module 3 - biological parameters
Waterwatch Australia Steering Committee
Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2004
ISBN 0 6425 4856 0
Understanding the health of the habitat involves following standardised sampling and sorting procedures and identification to the level of order or family. This method produces data of known quality and can be used to assess the condition of sites in the waterway.
The SIGNAL 2 score provides an indication of things that might be affecting waterbugs at a site, such as water quality or habitat. SIGNAL stands for 'Stream Invertebrate Grade Number – Average Level'. Each type of macro-invertebrate has a grade number from 1 to 10, based on its sensitivity to organic pollution. A low-grade number means the waterbug is more tolerant of water pollution. More sensitive waterbugs have high grade numbers. The grade numbers for groups containing phyla, classes and orders can be used but the most accurate SIGNAL scores for a site are obtained by using grade numbers of families.
SIGNAL 2 scores are based on the number of different types of water bugs in the sample. The procedure described here does not use relative abundance but weighting of abundance is possible.
Templates for result sheets required for monitoring macroinvertebrates to understand river health can be found in Appendix 1 of this module (major groups and family level).
Some material in this section has been sourced from SIGNAL 2 Manual, Bruce Chessman, 2003 (www.deh.gov.au/water/rivers/nrhp/signal/index.html).
Before rushing out to sample macro-invetebrates, it is important to decide on the objectives of your monitoring program (see Module 2 on how to develop a monitoring plan). It is also a good idea to undertake a site description assessment to document any changes at your site over time to aid you in interpreting your results (a site description record sheet is available in Appendix 1).
Always keep the riffle and edgewater samples separate from one another and in particular only compare samples that have been collected in the same manner. Sampling must not be done when the stream is swollen or turbid due to recent rains. Refer to the notes on safety in Modules 1 and 4.
The general equipment you will need for both the kick sampling and sweep sampling techniques includes:
Kick sampling in riffles is the recommended technique as it is used by professional aquatic ecologists, and riffles contain the greatest diversity of macro-invertebrates.
This technique samples the organisms living in edgewaters of waterways where riffles are unavailable. The best edgewater sites have overhanging or emergent vegetation, undercut banks or root mats that provide suitable living places for macro-invertebrates.
Do not mix samples from different habitats, for example, from riffles, edgewaters, or artificial substrates. Each habitat supports a distinct community of macro-invertebrates.
Sort your samples at the site. However, if you have to leave the site before sorting due to lack of time, bad weather or other constraints, take your samples back to your work-base. You can do this by placing your samples into garbage bags with water, loosely tying off the top and placing the bags into large plastic buckets. Remove most of the air from the bags to prevent buffeting during the trip back. If it is a hot day or a long drive, use battery powered aerators to maintain dissolved oxygen levels. Return all organisms to the waterway after noting them on your Record Sheet.
To ensure that an adequate number of macro-invertebrates are collected from the sample, you should aim to transfer around 100 to 200 waterbugs from the sorting tray to ice-cube trays. This generally takes one person between 30 minutes and an hour depending on their experience and the site.
You can identify macro-invertebrates either by comparing collected specimens with illustrations of the various groups, or by using identification keys.
Identification keys generally consist of a series of paired descriptions of particular bodily features. Each pair, called a couplet, is numbered. You begin with the first couplet and select the description that best fits the specimen you are ‘keying’. The chosen alternative will direct you to another numbered couplet. Continue this process until you have eliminated enough wrong alternatives to positively identify the specimen.
Some Waterwatch manuals contain keys or pictorial guides to macro-invertebrates which are a good start. If you are wanting more detailed information there is a range of books, compact discs and web sites which are very useful (see Further resources for a list).
It is a very good idea to build a reference collection of aquatic invertebrates. Place up to three or four of each kind in a glass jar or vial. The sample glass jars or vials should be filled with 90 per cent ethanol and sealed to prevent the alcohol from evaporating. You can use methylated spirits if you cannot get ethanol. Add a label that records the type of macro-invertebrate, date and place of collection. You should check these samples every few months and top up the alcohol if necessary. You may need to get permission from your state government agency to sample and preserve macroinvertebrates.
By building a reference collection you will come to know the macro-invertebrates much better and it will make it easier for others to identify their samples. You should get your reference collection checked by an aquatic ecologist. Future Waterwatchers and experts can look at your reference collections and see what kinds of animals lived at your sites in the past.
Quality control includes the steps you take to make sure your data are accurate and precise. The main quality control challenge is to make sure the sample collected is representative of the macro-invertebrate community living at the site and animals are correctly identified.
The following internal quality control checks are recommended.
The following external quality control checks are recommended.
SIGNAL stands for ‘Stream Invertebrate Grade Number – Average Level.’ It is a simple scoring system for macroinvertebrate (water bug) samples from Australian rivers.
A SIGNAL score gives an indication of water quality in the river from which the sample was collected. Rivers with high SIGNAL scores are likely to have low levels of salinity, turbidity and nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. They are also likely to be high in dissolved oxygen.
When considered together with macro-invertebrate richness (the number of types of macro-invertebrates), SIGNAL can provide indications of the types of pollution and other physical and chemical factors that are affecting the macro-invertebrate community.